Lacy v. Riverbend Maximum Security Institution
Anthony J. Lacy |
Riverbend Maximum Security Institution |
2:2022cv00040 |
April 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
J Ronnie Greer |
Cynthia R Wyrick |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER, it appears from the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #5 that Petitioner is unable to pay the filing fee, that motion is GRANTED. Also, while it appears that the claims in the petition are time-barred, subject to dismissal under the doctrine of procedural default, and/or fail to state a cognizable claim for relief under 2254, the Clerk is DIRECTED to serve Respondent with a copy of the petition #1 , the exhibits thereto [Doc. 1-1], and this order, and Respondent is hereby ORDERED to answer or otherwise respond to the petition within sixty days of the date of this order. Signed by District Judge J. Ronnie Greer on 5/3/22. (c/m Anthony J. Lacy 528622 RIVERBEND MAXIMUM SECURITY INSTITUTION 7475 COCKRILL BEND BOULEVARD NASHVILLE, TN 37209-1048 ) (ADA) |
Filing 7 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT statement by Petitioner Anthony J. Lacy (ADA) |
Filing 6 ORDER. Petitioner has not provided a certificate showing the amount of money or securities he has in any account in the institution. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to pay the full filing fee or submit the necessary documents to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge J. Ronnie Greer on 4/14/22. (c/m Anthony J. Lacy 528622 RIVERBEND MAXIMUM SECURITY INSTITUTION 7475 COCKRILL BEND BOULEVARD NASHVILLE, TN 37209-1048 with account form) (ADA) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony J. Lacy. (ADA) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John H Bledsoe, III on behalf of Riverbend Maximum Security Institution (Bledsoe, John) |
Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address. (Copy of Notice mailed to Anthony J. Lacy). (LCK) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Deficiency (IFP) - The Court is in receipt of your complaint/petition. However, in order for this matter to proceed, you must either pay the required filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Copy of Notice and IFP mailed to Anthony J. Lacy). (LCK) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Anthony J. Lacy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope). (LCK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lacy v. Riverbend Maximum Security Institution | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Anthony J. Lacy | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Riverbend Maximum Security Institution | |
Represented By: | John H Bledsoe, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.