Swann v. Sexton et al
Blake O'bryan Swann |
Keith Sexton, Kecter, Wallen, Sigmud, Dawes and Washington County Detention Center |
2:2022cv00064 |
June 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
J Ronnie Greer |
Cynthia R Wyrick |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Letter from Blake O. Swann re commissary history (ADA) |
Filing 7 Order to Show Cause for an Preliminary Injunction and a Temporary Restraining Order by Blake O'bryan Swann. (ADA) |
Filing 6 Letter from Blake Swann (AGG) |
Filing 5 Letter from Blake Swann. (AMP) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Blake O'bryan Swann. (Attachments: #1 Motion to Proceed/In Support, #2 Envelope) (AMP) |
Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address. (Copy of Notice mailed to Blake O'bryan Swann) (CAT) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Deficiency (IFP) - The Court is in receipt of your complaint/petition. However, in order for this matter to proceed, you must either pay the required filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Copy of IFP & Notice mailed to Blake O'bryan Swann) (CAT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dawes, Kecter, Keith Sexton, Sigmud, Wallen, Washington County Detention Center (Filing fee NOT PAID), filed by Blake O'bryan Swann. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.