Dixon v. McCoy et al
| James L. Dixon |
| Tammy W McCoy, Steve Figura and John Kerwin Nelson |
| 2:2022cv00148 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Clifton L Corker |
| Cynthia R Wyrick |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Injunction |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by John Kerwin Nelson. (CAT) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Steve Figura.(JCK) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Steve Figura, Tammy W McCoy, John Kerwin Nelson and given to James Dixon for service of process. (Attachments: #1 Summons TVA - Tammy W. McCoy, #2 Summons Steve Figura)(LCK) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Accordingly, to the extent Dixon's Complaint requests a TRO prohibiting the TVA from taking further action to address his alleged permit violations [Doc. 1], his request is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 11/29/2022. (Copy of Order mailed to James L. Dixon)(JCK)
|
| Filing 2 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address. (Copy of Notice mailed to James L. Dixon). (LCK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Steve Figura, Tammy W McCoy, John Kerwin Nelson (Filing fee $ 402 PAID: Receipt #200000187) filed by James L. Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet). (LCK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
