International Muffler Company v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
International Muffler Company |
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers |
3:2007cv00123 |
April 9, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Knoxville Office |
Loudon |
H Bruce Guyton |
Thomas W Phillips |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: International Muffler Company v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: International Muffler Company | |
Represented By: | Matthew M Scoggins |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers | |
Represented By: | W Gary Kohlman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.