Walker et al v. Louisville Ladder, Inc.
| Larry L. Walker and Cynthia Walker |
| Louisville Ladder, Inc. |
| 3:2007cv00377 |
| October 1, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Morgan |
| C Clifford Shirley |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER that Plaintiffs' 70 Supplemental MOTION Allowing videotaped deposition of Dr. Michael McCollum is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall be allowed to use the videotaped deposition of Dr. Michael McCollum at trial. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 2/24/09. (ANB)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER granting defendant's 16 Motion to Exclude Opinion Testimony. The plaintiff's proposed expert, Stanley Kiska, shall not be allowed to offer experttestimony in this matter. Additionally, to the extent that the plaintiff seeks to int roduce the video demonstration in support of the Induced Walking test, the video is also excluded. To the extent that the plaintiff seeks to introduce the video demonstration (limited to the segments noted in this Order) as a recreation of the accident, the Court finds that it currently lacks a proper evidentiary foundation, and admissibility at trial is necessarily contingent upon the proper foundation being laid at trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley on 02/09/09. (MGM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
