Rutherford v. Credit Bureau of North America, LLC et al
William T. Rutherford |
Credit Bureau of North America, LLC, First Investment Services, LLC, Terry Clark, Does 1-5 and First Tennessee Bank National Association |
3:2008cv00019 |
January 23, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Knoxville Office |
Sevier |
C Clifford Shirley |
Thomas A Varlan |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 46 Credit Bureau of North America LLC, First Investment Services LLC, and Terry Clark's MOTION for Additional Time to Respond and to File Responsive Pleading. The Clerk's Entries of Default 43 44 45 as to Credit Bureau of North America LLC, Terry Clark, and First Investment Services, LLC, are hereby VACATED. The Defendants SHALL FILE their answer on or before March 19, 2012. The parties SHALL PREPARE this case for trial at 9:00 a. m. on June 27, 2012 no further extensions of the trial date will be given absent extraordinary and compelling cause; and the parties SHALL APPEAR for a Pretrial Conference on 6/20/2012 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 3A - Knoxville before Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on March 16, 2012. (AYB) |
Filing 34 MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 30 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 7/14/11. (ABF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.