Wackenhut Services, Inc. v. International Guards Union of America, Local No. 3

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Eastern District Wackenhut Services, Inc. v. International Guards Union of America, Local No. 3

Wackenhut Services, Inc. v. International Guards Union of America, Local No. 3

Plaintiff:	Wackenhut Services, Inc.
Defendant:	International Guards Union of America, Local No. 3
Case Number:	3:2008cv00304
Filed:	August 4, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office:	Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations Office
County:	Anderson
Presiding Judge:	Thomas W Phillips
Presiding Judge:	C Clifford Shirley
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	29:185 Employee Pension Plan

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 12, 2010	Filing 20 ORDER denying 7 plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 11 defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment, whereby plaintiff's vacatur action is DISMISSED with prejudice. WSI is O RDERED TO COMPLY WITH THE ARBITRATION AWARD issued by Marsha Murphy on May 7, 2008, by furnishing the necessary financial records of the affected employees, and by paying each employee the amounts reflected in such records. In addition, the Court wil l award prejudgment interest on such payments, at 10% per annum pursuant to Tenn. Code. Ann. § 47-14-123, from the date that WSI stopped paying weekend premiums to employees who worked 12-hour shifts at the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, to the date that WSI began paying weekend premiums to those employees in 2007. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on April 12, 2010. (AYB)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 12, 2010

Filing 20 ORDER denying 7 plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 11 defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment, whereby plaintiff's vacatur action is DISMISSED with prejudice. WSI is O RDERED TO COMPLY WITH THE ARBITRATION AWARD issued by Marsha Murphy on May 7, 2008, by furnishing the necessary financial records of the affected employees, and by paying each employee the amounts reflected in such records. In addition, the Court wil l award prejudgment interest on such payments, at 10% per annum pursuant to Tenn. Code. Ann. § 47-14-123, from the date that WSI stopped paying weekend premiums to employees who worked 12-hour shifts at the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, to the date that WSI began paying weekend premiums to those employees in 2007. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on April 12, 2010. (AYB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wackenhut Services, Inc. v. International Guards Union of America, Local No. 3
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wackenhut Services, Inc.
Represented By:	Edwin H Rayson, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: International Guards Union of America, Local No. 3
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?