Carson v. U.S. Office of Special Counsel
Plaintiff: Joseph P Carson
Defendant: U.S. Office of Special Counsel
Case Number: 3:2008cv00330
Filed: August 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Labor: Other Office
County: Knox
Presiding Judge: H Bruce Guyton
Presiding Judge: Thomas W Phillips
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER denying 79 Plaintiff's request for reconsideration of the court's order of July 9, 2010 denying his Fourth Motion for Correction or Modification of the Record. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on July 27, 2010. (AYB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carson v. U.S. Office of Special Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph P Carson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Office of Special Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?