Stanley v. Union County Sheriffs Department et al
Thomas Stanley |
Union County Sheriffs Department and Union County Jail |
3:2008cv00365 |
September 11, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Claiborne |
H Bruce Guyton |
Thomas W Phillips |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER directing the Clerk to file this action without prepayment of costs as of the date the complaint was received. However, process shall not issue, and this action is dismissed sua sponte as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which re lief can be granted. The Court certifies that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. Therefore, this Court denies the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Plaintiff is assessed the civil filing fee of $350. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this M/O to the Sheriff of Claiborne County, Tennessee, and the county attorney for Claiborne County, Tennessee, to ensure that the custodian of the plaintiff's inmate tr ust account complies with that portion of the PLRA. Further, the Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this M/O to the Court's financial deputy.Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on September 30, 2008. (copy mailed to Mr. Stanley, Sheriff David Ray, and County Attorney James Estep) (AYB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.