Bowman et al v. Crossmark, Inc
Plaintiff: Kathi Bowman
Defendant: Crossmark, Inc
Case Number: 3:2009cv00016
Filed: January 12, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Labor: Fair Standards Office
County: Campbell
Presiding Judge: R Leon Jordan
Presiding Judge: C Clifford Shirley
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 102 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order.Signed by District Judge R Leon Jordan on 7/5/12. (ABF)
July 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order.Signed by District Judge R Leon Jordan on 7/19/10. (ABF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bowman et al v. Crossmark, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathi Bowman
Represented By: John M Lawhorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crossmark, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?