Thomas v. Bivens et al
Plaintiff: Christ Didymus Thomas
Defendant: James D Bivens, John Doe, Jane Doe, City of Madisonville, Tennessee and Monroe County, Tennessee
Case Number: 3:2009cv00062
Filed: February 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: Thomas W Phillips
Presiding Judge: C Clifford Shirley
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part under FRCvP 56 (22) [(10) in case 3:09-cv-00093] defendant Monroe County's Motion for Summary Judgment as follows: All of plaintiff's federal civil rights claims brought against Monroe County, and John Doe and Jane Doe officers of Monroe County under § 1983 are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's state law claim for conversion is REMANDED to the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Tennessee. Defendant James Bivens and the City of Madisonville's motion for summary judgment (25) [(13) in case 3:09-cv-00093] is GRANTED IN PART as follows: All of plaintiff's federal civil rights claims brought against the City of Madisonville, and John and Jane Doe offic ers of the City of Madisonville under § 1983 are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The motion is DENIED as to the § 1983 claims against James Bivens, in his individual capacity. Plaintiff's state law claim for negligence is REMANDED to the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Tennessee. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on January 5, 2011. Associated Cases: 3:09-cv-00062, 3:09-cv-00093 (AYB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Bivens et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christ Didymus Thomas
Represented By: Ralph E Harwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James D Bivens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Madisonville, Tennessee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monroe County, Tennessee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?