Watson v. Rentenbach Engineering, Construction Division et al
| Marilyn S Watson |
| Rentenbach Engineering, Construction Division, Rentenbach Constructors, Incorporated, Autumn Alexander, Kimberly Michelle Hammontree and Carol Jamerson |
| 3:2009cv00150 |
| April 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| Knox |
| C Clifford Shirley |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER that the Court ACCEPTS in part and REJECTS in part the R&R 34 and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants Rentenbach Engineering, Construction Division and Rentenbach Constructors, Incorporated, and Carol Jamersons Moti on for Judgment on the ERISA Administrative Record 30 . Plaintiffs state-law claims are REMANDED to the Chancery Court for Knox County, Tennessee for that courts consideration and determination. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 3/28/13. (c/m) (ABF) Modified on 3/28/2013 (ABF).
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant's 7 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim Relating to the June 18, 2001 Hardship Distribution. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 11/10/09. (ABF) Modified on 11/10/2009 to indicate copy mailed to Autumn Alexander (ABF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
