Invisible Fence, Inc v. Neosel et al
Plaintiff: Invisible Fence, Inc
Defendant: Martin Neosel and Acorn Marketing, Inc
Case Number: 3:2009cv00251
Filed: June 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Knoxville Office
County: Knox
Presiding Judge: H Bruce Guyton
Presiding Judge: Thomas A Varlan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER that the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R 32 and GRANTS plaintiffs' request for attorney fees and monetary sanctions and DENIES plaintiff's request to transfer the acornpetco.com domain name. Defendants are hereby FI NED $100,000 for failure to comply with the Court's default judgment order and plaintiff is AWARDED $8,934.40 in reasonable expenses from defendants in connection with its motion to show cause and for sanctions. The Clerk is DIRECTED t o mail a copy of this order, via certified mail, to defendants at the address provided by plaintiff: Martin Neosel, Acorn Marketing, Inc., 47-09 188th Street, Queens, NY 11358. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 2/27/13. (Certified mail to Martin Neosel, Acorn Marketing, certified mail #7009 1680 0001 7402 5707) (ABF)
December 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER granting 23 Motion for Order to Show Cause. The parties shall appear before the undersigned at 1:30 p.m. on January 7, 2013, for a show cause hearing. At that time, the Defendants SHALL SHOW CAUSE why they should not be he ld in contempt or otherwise sanctioned under Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for violating the Courts Default Order [Doc. 15]. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 12/03/2012. (copy mailed via certified mail to the Defendants per order. USPS Tracking ID: 7009 1680 0001 7402 6315) (KMK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Invisible Fence, Inc v. Neosel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Invisible Fence, Inc
Represented By: Robert E Pitts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin Neosel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acorn Marketing, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?