Powell v. State of Tennessee et al
Marilyn Powell |
State of Tennessee, Phil Bredesen, Tennessee Department of Children's Services, Viola Miller, Blount County Sheriff Office, James Berrong, Dale Gourley and John Adams |
3:2010cv00126 |
March 26, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Knoxville Office |
C Clifford Shirley |
Thomas A Varlan |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER that the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation 25 and OVERRULES plaintiffs objection 27 . In addition to the above, this Court has carefully reviewed this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and hereby CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal in this matter by plaintiff would not be taken in good faith and plaintiff may not proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiffs motion/application to proceed in forma pauperis [23 ] is, therefore, DENIED. If plaintiff files a notice of appeal, she must also pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and supporting affidavit in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit within thirty(30) days of the entry of this order.. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 8/5/10. C/M (ABF) |
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order.Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 6/24/10. (C/M to pro se plaintiff)(ABF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.