De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc v. Jefferson County Board of Education

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Eastern District De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc v. Jefferson County Board of Education

De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc v. Jefferson County Board of Education

Plaintiff:	De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc
Defendant:	Jefferson County Board of Education
Case Number:	3:2010cv00145
Filed:	April 5, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office:	Knoxville Office
County:	Jefferson
Presiding Judge:	H Bruce Guyton
Presiding Judge:	Thomas W Phillips
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 1, 2011	Filing 19 ORDER granting 18 defendant Board's Motion to Stay Discovery, whereby discovery in this case is STAYED until the parties conduct a Rule 26(f) discovery planning conference. The parties shall conduct the Rule 26(f) conference by APRIL 4, 2011. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on March 1, 2011. (AYB)
January 14, 2011	Filing 12 ORDER denying 3 the Board's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and granting 5 DLL's Motion to Amend the Complaint. Accordingly, DLL is granted leave pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure t o file an amended complaint asserting a new basis for subject matter jurisdiction. Pursuant to Local Rule 15.1, DLL shall file the amended complaint in its entirety within ten days of entry of this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on January 14, 2011. (AYB)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 1, 2011

Filing 19 ORDER granting 18 defendant Board's Motion to Stay Discovery, whereby discovery in this case is STAYED until the parties conduct a Rule 26(f) discovery planning conference. The parties shall conduct the Rule 26(f) conference by APRIL 4, 2011. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on March 1, 2011. (AYB)

January 14, 2011

Filing 12 ORDER denying 3 the Board's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and granting 5 DLL's Motion to Amend the Complaint. Accordingly, DLL is granted leave pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure t o file an amended complaint asserting a new basis for subject matter jurisdiction. Pursuant to Local Rule 15.1, DLL shall file the amended complaint in its entirety within ten days of entry of this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on January 14, 2011. (AYB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc v. Jefferson County Board of Education
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc
Represented By:	Joseph P Rusnak
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Jefferson County Board of Education
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?