Jones v. Hall et al
| James A Jones, Jr. |
| Tony Hall, Joey Mattina, Jane Doe and Knoxville Police Department |
| 3:2010cv00247 |
| June 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Knox |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
JUDGMENT ORDER, entered by the Clerk, granting the defendants' motion to dismiss; dismissing the Jane Doe defendant; denying as moot all other pending motions; and dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on September 22, 2011. (mailed to Mr. Jones) (AYB)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER of Deficiency directing the Clerk to file the complaint as of the date the complaint was received. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to pay the full filing fee or to submit the necessary documen ts. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is hereby NOTIFIED that if he fails to fully comply with this Order within the time required, the court shall presume that plaintiff is not a pauper, shall assess the full amount of fees, and shall order the case dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on July 15, 2010. (copy and ifp application mailed to Mr. Jones) (AYB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
