Faulkner v. Mattina et al
| Eric Benjamin Faulkner |
| City of Knoxville, Tennessee, Joseph P Mattina, Benjamin McVay and Sterling P Owen, IV |
| 3:2011cv00250 |
| June 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Knox |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Thomas W Phillips |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Defendant officers' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Faulkner's claim arising under § 1985; his § 1983 claims arising under the First Amendment, the Eighth Amendme nt, the Equal Protection Clause, and the Due Process Clause; and his state law claims for false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, violations of the Tennessee Human Rights Act, official misconduct, and violation of the Tennessee Const itution. Defendants' motion for summary judgment 20 is otherwise DENIED. Plaintiff's motion to deny the Defendants' motion for summary judgment 28 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part consistent with the above; and as a result of this Opinion and Order, Plaintiff's only remaining claims against the officers are his claim for excessive force under § 1983, his state law claims of assault and battery, and his state law claims of outrageous conduct and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Signed by District Judge Karen K Caldwell on January 17, 2014. (AYB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
