Webber v. Anderson County Detention Facility et al
| Daniel Michael Webber |
| Davidson, Anderson County Detention Facility, Reynolds, B Allen and Parker |
| 3:2011cv00341 |
| July 19, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Anderson |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Thomas W Phillips |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER directing the Clerk to file this action without the prepayment of costs or fees as of the date the complaint was received. However, process shall not issue and this action is dismissed as frivolous and for failu re to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The court certifies that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. Plaintiff is assessed the civil filing fee of $350. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Sheriff of Anderson County, Tennessee, and the county attorney for Anderson County, Tennessee, to ensure that the custodian of the plaintiff's inmate trust account complies with that portion of the Prison Litigation Reform Act relating to payment of the filing fee. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to forward a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the court's financial deputy. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on October 27, 2011. (mailed to Mr. Webber) (AYB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
