CNX Gas Company LLC v. Miller Energy Resources Inc et al (TV1)
| CNX Gas Company LLC |
| Miller Energy Resources Inc, Chevron Appalachia, LLC, Cresta Capital Strategies, LLC and Scott Boruff |
| 3:2011cv00362 |
| August 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| C Clifford Shirley |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, the Court GRANTS Chevron Appalachia,LLC's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction 36 , and Chevron is DISMISSED as a party to this action. Accordingly, Chevron's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment 19 is hereby DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 4/23/12. (ADA)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 29 Motion for Joinder. The Court will interpret the Motion to Join as incorporating a request for amendment pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to add Atlas Energy Tennessee a s a defendant in CNXs complaint. The Court finds this request well-taken, and it is GRANTED. CNX shall file an amended complaint on or before April 17, 2012.Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley on 4/10/2012. (DCP, ) Modified on 4/10/2012 (DCP, ). Update text.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
