Nichols v. Knox County, Tennessee et al
| Donald Nichols |
| Knox County, Tennessee, Amy Luxford, Selenia Allen, Deanna Jones, Judy Simms, Deborah Burel, Melanie Adams, Donald Keeble, M.D., Donald Keeble, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 3:2011cv00417 |
| August 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Knox |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Thomas W Phillips |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
216
ORDER denying 169 Knox County's motion for the Court to revise its earlier opinion; denying 170 Knox County's second motion for leave to amend its answer; denying 171 Knox County's second motion for the Court to revise its earlier opinion; denying as moot 178 Knox County's motion for judgment on the pleadings; denying as moot 179 Knox County's motion for oral argument; granting 196 Knox County's motion for leave to file supplemental evi dence; denying 202 Knox County's second motion in limine; denying 209 Knox County's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff's oral motion for leave to file an amended complaint is Granted. The plain tiff shall file his amended complaint on or before Thursday, March 10, 2016. Knox County shall have 21 days thereafter to file its answer. Because the plaintiff is filing an amended complaint, Knox County's dispositive deadline shall be extended. Any dispositive motion shall be filed by Knox County no more than 30 days after the plaintiff files his amended complaint. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on March 1, 2016. (AYB)
|
|
Filing
168
ORDER denying 158 Knox County's MOTION to Amend. The plaintiff's motion to lift the stay and set the case for trial 164 is Granted. Trial shall commence on Tuesday, July 12, 2016. The parties are directed to contact Magistrate Judge Guyton's chambers to arrange a scheduling conference. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on September 29, 2015. (AYB)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER granting 137 Plaintiff's Motion to Hold Defendants' Bill of Costs and Motion for Attorney Fees in Abeyance Pending the Outcome of the Appeals. However, the Bill of Costs 134 and Motion for Attorney Fees 132 wil l be DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, to allow refiling of the same as appropriate. This relief is equivalent to the relief requested and eliminates the need for status reports during the period of abeyance. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on September 30, 2014. (AYB)
|
|
Filing
121
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, the plaintiff's motion for leave to file extra pages and his motion to file a sur-reply 104 & 117 are GRANTED. The defendants' motions to strike the legal conclusions in the plaintiffs� 39; experts' testimony is GRANTED. Nurse Luxford's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 46] is DENIED; Knox Countys motion for summary judgment 57 is DENIED; and the motion for summary judgment filed by Nurses Adams, Allen, Bunch, Jones, and Simms 41 is GRANTED IN PART with respect to the claims against Nurses Adams, Bunch, and Simms and DENIED IN PART with respect to the plaintiffs claims against Nurses Allen and Jones. Finally, the claims brought against unnamed John Doe and Jane Doe defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice.Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 6/19/14. (ADA)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER denying 106 Motion for Clarification or in the Alternative to Modify Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 02/18/2014. (KAW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
