Irwin et al v. Tennessee Valley Authority et al
Mark Homer, Margaret Rogers, Ricki Draper, Chris Irwin, Bonnie Swinford and Matt Jones |
Tennessee Valley Authority, Tom Kilgore, Steve Kelly, John Doe and Jane Doe |
3:2012cv00035 |
January 23, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Knoxville Office |
Knox |
Thomas W Phillips |
C Clifford Shirley |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER granting 32 Defendant TVA's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction on Mootness Grounds. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the matter. Signed by District Judge Tena Campbell on July 30, 2013. (AYB) |
Filing 24 ORDER, The Plaintiffs' Motion for Court's Leave to File First Amended Complaint 23 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are directed to file the First Amended Complaint as soon as practicable. The Plaintiffs' Motion for Default J udgment Against Steve Kelly 6 is DENIED. The Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment Against Tennessee Valley Authority 7 is DENIED. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 2 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Tom Kilgore, who was named in his official capacity as CEO of TVA is hereby DISMISSED from the case. The court DISMISSES Steve Kelly from this case because he has qualified immunity. Signed by District Judge Tena Campbell on 4/17/13. (ADA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.