Progressive Hawaii Insurance Corporation v. Davis et al
| Progressive Hawaii Insurance Corporation |
| Estate of Justin Walker, Geico Insurance Company, Nakia Davis, Xavier Bingham, Ryan Westbrook, James A Russell, Angelic Hodge and Allstate Insurance Company |
| 3:2012cv00574 |
| November 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Knox |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 2/26/14. (ABF)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER finding that Defendant Ryan Westbrooks Motions to Adopt 41 and 44 are well-taken, and they are GRANTED. For the reasons stated below, more fully stated at the hearing and set forth more fully herein, the Motion to Dismiss or for Order Compelling Discovery and Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment 40 , Motion to Compel Discovery and Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment 42 , and Motion to Compel Discovery and Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 43 are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 08/16/2013. (KAW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
