Wright v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Plaintiff: Roger William Wright
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Case Number: 3:2013cv00065
Filed: February 6, 2013
Court: Tennessee Eastern District Court
Office: Knoxville Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: Thomas W Phillips
Referring Judge: C Clifford Shirley
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 4, 2013 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the Report and Recommendation 9 of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED IN WHOLE. Defendant Commissioner's motion to dismiss 5 is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 11/4/13. (ABF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger William Wright
Represented By: Timothy P Coode
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?