Lick Branch Unit, LLC et al v. Reed et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 3, 2016
MEMORANDUM: The Court finds Defendants own the working interest in the oil, gas, and minerals beneath Defendants' property because Plaintiffs' working interest reverted to Defendants via statute. The Court will therefore GRANT Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment 97 and DENY Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment 101 .Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 11/3/2016. (aws, )
|February 10, 2014
MEMORANDUM: the Court will GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART Defendants' motions (Court File Nos. 26 , 28 ). Specifically, the Court will DENY Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Court F ile No. 28). The Court will also DENY Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs civil RICO with respect to Jim Reed and James Lueking, tortious interference with a contract, conversion, nuisance, civil conspiracy, and slander of title claims (Court File No. 26). The Court will GRANT Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' civil RICO claim with respect to Charles Bruce Reed, tortious interference with business relations, abuse of process, interference with the Unit, and attorney's fees claims (Court File No. 26). An Order shall enter. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 2/10/2014. (BJL, )
|June 21, 2013
ORDER holding in abeyance 9 Motion to Vacate; granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Maintain Status Quo. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 06/21/2013. (KAW)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?