Defenders of Wildlife et al v. Jewell et al
| Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club, Statewide Organizing for Community Empowerment and Tennessee Clean Water Network |
| Sally Jewell, Dan Ashe, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Joseph Pizarchik and U.S. Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation, and Enforcement |
| National Mining Association and Tennessee Mining Association |
| 3:2013cv00698 |
| November 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Curtis L Collier |
| C Clifford Shirley |
| Environmental Matters |
| 16 U.S.C. ยง 1538 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a sur-reply 95 is Granted; the plaintiffs' motion to strike 95 is Denied as Moot. The defendants' motion to dismiss 81 is Granted in Part and Denied in Part. The motion is Granted with respect to Counts V, VI, VII, and VIII; those counts are dismissed. The motion to dismiss is Denied with respect to Counts I, II, III, and IV. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 1/28/15. (ADA)
|
|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 11/26/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 11/26/2013.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
