Merritt et al v. Mountain Laurel Chalets, Inc. et al
| Melinda Merritt and Benjamin Olivas |
| Progressive Employer Management Company II, Inc., Mountain Laurel Chalets, Inc and RSC Properties, General Partnership |
| 3:2014cv00019 |
| January 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Sevier |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Harry S Mattice |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER that Defendants motions to dismiss 16 and 18 are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants motions to dismiss plaintiffs claims brought against PEMCO under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the False Claims Act are DEN IED; the motions are GRANTED as to the state law claims brought against PEMCO for violation of the Tennessee Public Protection Act, the Tennessee Lawful Employment Act, and the Tennessee common law. Accordingly, these state law claims against PEMCO a re DISMISSED, with prejudice. Defendants motions to dismiss all federal and state law claims brought against RSC are GRANTED. Accordingly, all claims against RSC are DISMISSED, with prejudice; and RSC is DISMISSED as a defendant in this action. Defendants motions to dismiss Plaintiffs federal and/or state law claims brought against Mountain Laurel Chalets, Inc., are DENIED. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 3/27/15. (ABF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
