United States of America v. Radio Equipment et al
United States of America |
Radio Equipment et al and Arthur Lee Young |
Roseline H Young |
3:2014cv00047 |
February 4, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Knoxville Office |
Sevier |
H Bruce Guyton |
Thomas A Varlan |
Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1341 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 JUDGMENT, entered by the Clerk, granting the government's motion for judgment on the pleadings as follows: It is Ordered and Adjudged that the United States recover of Arthur Lee Young in the amount of $22,000 plus costs i ncurred by the United States and interest from the date of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. The United States is Ordered to submit a bill of costs within 30 days of the entry of this judgment. It is further ordered that all equipment assoc iated with or used in connection with any radio transmission on the Frequency 87.9 MHz from in or around the vicinity of 4923 and 4927 East Parkway, Cosby, Tennessee 37722, which was seized pursuant to a warrant for arrest of articles in rem issued o n February 4, 2014, is forfeited to the United States pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 510, and all right, title, and interest in the defendant equipment is vested in the United States. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on March 31, 2015. (mailed to pro se parties) (AYB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.