Ellis v. Morgan County Sheriff's Department et al (PLR2)
Sue Ann Ellis |
Morgan County Sheriff's Department, Glen Freytag, Don Edwards, Andrea Adams and Morgan County, Tennessee |
3:2014cv00140 |
April 3, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Knoxville Office |
Morgan |
Pamela L Reeves |
C Clifford Shirley |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION: The plaintiff's motion to amend her complaint 20 is Denied; and the defendants' motion to dismiss 11 is Granted. The plaintiff's complaint is Dismissed with leave to refile upon the issuance of an appropriate right to sue letter under the ADA. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 12/30/14. (JBR) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Stay Imposition of the Scheduling Order. The deadline for completing a Rule 26(f) conference, the deadline for submitting a discovery plan, and the deadline for making ini tial disclosures are STAYED pending disposition of the Motion to Dismiss. By staying the deadline for the Rule 26(f) conference and the deadline for submitting a discovery plan, the Court has effectively stayed discovery in this matter. Should the District Judge deny the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 11 ], the stay is DEEMED LIFTED upon entry of the District Judges Memorandum Opinion and/or Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley, Jr on May 27, 2014. (RLK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.