Smith v. McCroskey et al
Carlton E. Smith |
Joy R McCroskey and Joshua D Hedrick |
3:2014cv00437 |
September 19, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Knoxville Office |
Knox |
Pamela L Reeves |
C Clifford Shirley |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION assessing the civil filing fee of $350. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Warden of the Turney Center Industrial Complex, the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Correction, and the Attorney General for the State of Tennessee to ensure that the custodian of the Plaintiff's inmate trust account complies with that portion of the Prison Litigation Reform Act relating to payment of the filing fee. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to forward a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Court's financial deputy. Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims 2 against Defendant Hedrick and Defendant McCroskey individually will be DISMISSED for failure t o state a claim and suing a defendant who is immune from the action for damages. However, with regard to his remaining claim against Defendant McCroskey in her official capacity, Plaintiff will be given thirty days from entry of the order accompanying this memorandum to remedy the deficiencies in his claim. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 4 will be DENIED. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on August 11, 2015. c/m (AYB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.