URS CH2M Oak Ridge LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon (TV3)
Plaintiff: URS CH2M Oak Ridge LLC
Defendant: Bank of New York Mellon
Case Number: 3:2015cv00465
Filed: October 16, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Knoxville Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Thomas A Varlan
Presiding Judge: C Clifford Shirley
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 9/26/16. (JBR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: URS CH2M Oak Ridge LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon (TV3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: URS CH2M Oak Ridge LLC
Represented By: Ursula Bailey
Represented By: R David Ware
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of New York Mellon
Represented By: Katie Blankenship
Represented By: Paul S Davidson
Represented By: Michael Thomas Harmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?