Munson Hardisty, LLC v. Legacy Pointe Apartments, LLC (TV3)
| Munson Hardisty, LLC |
| Legacy Pointe Apartments, LLC |
| 3:2015cv00547 |
| December 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Knox |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| C Clifford Shirley |
| False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
274
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Clerk is DIRECTED to deposit the funds into an interest-bearing account pursuant to Local Rule 67.1 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 67. Given the status of this case and pending appeal, the C ourt finds it appropriate to GRANT defendant's motion [Doc. 270 ] to deposit the total judgment amount with the Clerk of Court rather than direct defendant to pay plaintiff or its agent directly. Finally, plaintiff's Application for Writ of Execution [Doc. 267 ] is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 9/29/23. (JBR)
|
|
Filing
263
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 7/20/23. (JBR)
|
|
Filing
234
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Under Rule12(b)(7) for Failure to Join an Indispensable Party 211 is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Thomas A. Varlan on 9/22/22. (ADA)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER denying 109 defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Plaintiff may proceed with all claims against defendant as detailed in its Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on January 4, 2019. (AYB)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; the Court hereby OVERRULES defendant's Objection to Judge Shirley's Order 56 . Furthermore, as the Court has now resolved the attorney disqualification issue, the Clerk of Court is directed to LIFT the stay in this case. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A. Varlan on 5/30/17. (ADA)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER: the motion 68 is GRANTED to the extent that this action is hereby STAYED pending the Court's resolution of defendant's appeal of Judge Shirley's attorney disqualification order 56 . In addition, defendant� 39;s Motion to Dismiss 59 , and plaintiff's Motion for a Status Conference 63 and Motion to Amend 72 are DENIED without prejudice and with leave to renew upon the lifting of the stay. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on January 23, 2017. (AYB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Munson Hardisty, LLC v. Legacy Pointe Apartments, LLC (TV3) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Munson Hardisty, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Janet Dean Gertz |
| Represented By: | Matthew A Grossman |
| Represented By: | Ali M.M. Mojdehi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Legacy Pointe Apartments, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
