Dunn v. The Kroger Co. et al (TV2)
| Lucille Dunn and Joseph Dunn |
| The Kroger Co. |
| 3:2016cv00002 |
| January 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Sevier |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| C Clifford Shirley |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court has considered the filings in this case and finds Attorney Springmann's Motion to Withdraw 9 to be well-taken, and it is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are hereby ADMONISHED that they are DEEMED to be pro ceeding pro se. Until they obtain substitute counsel, it is their obligation to stay up to date on the status of this case and comply with the deadlines set by the Court. Likewise, if they elect to proceed in this case without an attorney, they are r esponsible for complying with all deadlines set by the Court and responding to any requests for relief by other parties, see E.D. Tenn. L.R. 7.1. Plaintiffs, like any other party, will be expected to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules, and the Courts Orders. To the extent they plan to retain new counsel, they should do so as soon as possible. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley, Jr on 2/29/16. (c/m Lucille & Joseph Dunn 3971 Kathy Hollar Road Sevierville, TN 37862) (ADA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
