Goodman v. Kingston, City of (PLR1)
Plaintiff: Jimmy L. Goodman
Defendant: Kingston, City of
Case Number: 3:2016cv00097
Filed: February 24, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Knoxville Office
County: Roane
Presiding Judge: Pamela L Reeves
Presiding Judge: C Clifford Shirley
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29:2601
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER denying 22 the City of Kingston's motion for summary judgment in its entirety. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on July 25, 2017. (AYB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goodman v. Kingston, City of (PLR1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimmy L. Goodman
Represented By: J Timothy Bobo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kingston, City of
Represented By: Benjamin K Lauderback
Represented By: Courtney E Read
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?