Wrede v. Carter et al (TV3)
||Elizabeth M Wrede
||William E Carter, Jr. and Allison Lee Pilchard
||March 28, 2016
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
||Thomas A Varlan
||C Clifford Shirley
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Personal Property Damage
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 9, 2017
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court finds Defendant Carter's Motion for Summary Judgement [Doc. 36 ] to be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and Defendant Pilchard's Motion for Summary Judgement [Doc. 39 ] to be DENIED. The Court DISMISSES the Plaintiff's claims regarding income loss, emotional damages, allegations regarding the sale of the Knoxville real property, and allegations regarding the Profit and Loss Detail's inaccuracy. The parties shall proceed to trial before this Court on January 31, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley, Jr on 1/9/17. (JBR)
|October 21, 2016
ORDER the Court finds the Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order 33 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is ORDERED The parties shall appear before the Court on December 1, 2016, at 1:30 p.m., for a motion hearing. T he initial pretrial conference scheduled for November 15, 2016, at 9:30 a.m., is hereby continued to January 23, 2017, at 9:30 a.m.. The trial scheduled for December 6, 2016, is continued to January 31, 2017, at 9:00 a.m.. All unexpired deadlines in the Scheduling Order 15 shall be recalculated according to the new trial date. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley, Jr on 10/21/16. (ADA)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?