Jones v. Clement et al
Tommy Earl Jones |
Bernard Clement, Amy Bowen, Georgia Crowell and Rita Reece |
3:2016cv00257 |
May 20, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Knoxville Office |
Johnson |
Pamela L Reeves |
C Clifford Shirley |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 84 ORDER, entered as a JUDGMENT: this pro se prisoner's civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because the Court has CERTIFIED in the memorandum that any appeal from this order would n ot be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the civil file. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on January 31, 2018. (copy mailed to Tommy Earl Jones #464968, NECX, P.O. Box 5000, Mountain City, TN 37683-5000) (AYB) |
Filing 59 ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Under Seal 54 is hereby DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 52 is hereby DENIED WITH LEAVE TO REFILE. Plaintiff's construed Motion for Leave to Amend his Complaint [57 ] is herebyDENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 56 is DENIED. The Court will enter a separate scheduling order to govern the remainder of this action. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on August 24, 2017. (copy mailed to Tommy Earl Jones #464968, NECX, 5249 Highway 67 West, P.O. Box 5000, Mountain City, TN 37683-5000) (AYB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.