Deramus v. McCoig
| Edmond B Deramus |
| Bud McCoig |
| 3:2016cv00275 |
| May 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Jefferson |
| J Ronnie Greer |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the reasons stated herein, the Court will GRANT Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 16] and this case will be DISMISSED. The Court will enter an order consistent with this opinion. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 03/05/2019. (Copy of Memo mailed Edmond Deramus) (AMP)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 9 MOTION for Hearing filed by Edmond B Deramus. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for a hearing [Doc. 9]. Therein, Plaintiff requests that a hearing be set for unspecified pen ding motions he filed in this action [Id.]. However, the Court's order filed on November 7, 2016 addresses all previously pending motions [Doc. 10]. Because there are no pending motions in this matter at this time, Plaintiff's motion for a hearing [Doc. 9] is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 11/30/2016. (C/M to pro se Plaintiff) (AMP)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 2 ] is GRANTED and his motion to appoint counsel [Doc. 3 ] and motion for default judgment [Doc. 7 ] are both DENI ED. To ensure compliance with the fee-collection procedure, the Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this order to the custodian of inmate accounts at the institution where Plaintiff is now confined. The Clerk is also DIRECTED to furnish a copy of thi s order to the Court's financial deputy. This order shall be placed in Plaintiffs prison file and follow him if he is transferred to another correctional institution. The Court further finds that Plaintiff failed to allege adequate facts to supp ort a claim that his conditions of confinement during his temporary stay in the drunk tank amounted to a violation of his constitutional rights. Therefore, Plaintiff's claims regarding his conditions of confinement are DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a service packet (a blank summons and USM 285 form) for Defendant. Plaintiff is ORDERED to complete the service packet and return it to the Clerk's Office within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 11/07/2016. (C/M to Custodian of Inmate Accounts; to pro se Plaintiff along with service packet; email to financial deputy) (AMP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Deramus v. McCoig | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edmond B Deramus | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bud McCoig | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
