Hodge v. Blount County et al (PLR2)
| Judy R Hodge |
| Blount County, James L Berrong, Henry Vaughn, Kevin Clendenen, Doug Davis, Doug Moore, Jeff Clark, Ron Talbott, James Long, DOES 1-10, inclusive and Douglas Davis |
| 3:2016cv00317 |
| June 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Blount |
| Pamela L Reeves |
| C Clifford Shirley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendants' joint motion for summary judgment [D. 131] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on May 11, 2020. (AYB)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, Henry Vaughn's motion for summary judgment 71 is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Count 1 is DISMISSED with prejudice. Count 6 is DISMISSED with prejudice as to the assault claim only. Plaintiff may proceed to trial on Counts 2, 6 (battery only), 7, and 9. Signed by District Judge Pamela L. Reeves on 3/23/18. (ADA)
|
|
Filing
82
Memorandum Opinion and ORDER: Blount County's motion to dismiss 53 is GRANTED on all claims except Count 6 and DENIED as to Count 6; and the Officer Defendants' motion to dismiss 56 is GRANTED as to Counts 3, 5, and 8, and DENIED as to Counts 1, 2, 6, 7, and 9. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on September 1, 2017. (AYB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
