Cramer v. Oak Haven Resort, Inc.
| Hazel Cramer |
| Oak Haven Resort, Inc., Steven E. Marshall, Betty W. Marshall and John Doe |
| 3:2016cv00491 |
| August 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Sevier |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Travis R McDonough |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER: Defendant Oak Haven Resort, Inc.s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Second Amended Complaint 82 and Steven Marshall and Betty Marshalls Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint 88 to be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court further DENIES Plaintiffs Objection to Steven and Betty Marshalls Motion for Summary Judgment 90 . Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 8/31/18. (ABF)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER re Plaintiffs Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice and Memorandum in Support [Doc. 62 , filed on January 18, 2018. Defendants SHALL file a response to Plaintiffs Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice on or before January 25, 2018. The Court will address the pending Motions [Docs. 57, 58, 62] and responses thereto at the pretrial conference on February 1, 2018.Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on January 19, 2018. (JAN, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
