Osann et al v. Sevier County, TN et al
| Shelia Dean Osann and Paul Osann |
| Sevier County, TN, Walker Marshall and Ronald L Seals |
| 3:2016cv00633 |
| October 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Sevier |
| Curtis L Collier |
| C Clifford Shirley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER: The court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). It is ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling that plaintiffs motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis 62 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 6/19/19. (c/m to Paul and Shelia Dean Osann, 869 Harvest Meadows Drive, Kodak, TN 37764) (ABF)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 1/22/19. (c/m to Shelia Dean Osann and Paul Osann, 869 Harvest Meadows Drive, Kodak, TN 37764)(ABF)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 8/8/17. (c/m to Shelia Dean Osann and Paul Osann, 869 Harvest Meadows Drive, Kodak, TN 37764)(ABF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
