Babb v. Maryville Anesthesiologists P.C. (TWP2)
Plaintiff: Paula Babb
Defendant: Maryville Anesthesiologists P.C.
Case Number: 3:2017cv00242
Filed: June 7, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Knoxville Office
County: Knox
Presiding Judge: Thomas W Phillips
Presiding Judge: C Clifford Shirley
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on 1/16/19. (ABF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Babb v. Maryville Anesthesiologists P.C. (TWP2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paula Babb
Represented By: Michael Ryan Franz
Represented By: W. Allen McDonald
Represented By: James H Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maryville Anesthesiologists P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?