Fitzpatrick v. Law Solutions Chicago, LLC et al (JRG2)
Michael H Fitzpatrick |
Law Solutions Chicago, LLC, Upright Law, LLC, George Doe, Jessica Odgie, Austen Heuser, Grace Gardiner and Judy Lovely |
3:2017cv00257 |
June 15, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Knoxville Office |
Knox |
J Ronnie Greer |
C Clifford Shirley |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The matters currently before the Court are two motions to dismiss, [Lead case, doc. 20 and Member case, doc. 21]. This Court has personal jurisdiction over defendants Doe, Heuser, Solis, Brown, and Sh eehan; therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants' motion to dismiss all claims against these defendants per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) is DENIED. However, in both the Lead case and the Member case, the complaints fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted as to every asserted cause of action. For the reasons discussed above, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants' motion to dismiss per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is GRANTED as to every claim, and all claims in the Lead case and the Member case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 03/21/2018. Associated Cases: 3:17-cv-00257-JRG-DCP, 3:17-cv-00258-JRG-DCP (AMP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.