Haynes v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. et al
| Leonard Haynes |
| Aramark Correctional Services, Inc., Tennessee Department of Corrections, Tony Parker, Darren Settles, Mary Brown, Dustin Brown, Sam Neely and Archie Doby |
| 3:2018cv00175 |
| May 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Bledsoe |
| J Ronnie Greer |
| Debra C Poplin |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM OPINION : For the reasons set forth above, the Court concludes that the relevant factors weigh in favor of dismissal of Plaintiff's action. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 11/20/2019. (Copy of Memorandum Opinion mailed to Leonard Haynes) (CAT)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, For the reasons set forth above, it is ORDERED:1. TDOC, Tony Parker, Darren Settles, Dustin Brown, Sam Neely, and Archie Dobyare DISMISSED from this action; 2. The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to send Plai ntiff a service packet (a blank summons and USM 285 form) for Defendants Aramark Correctional Services and Mary Brown. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 7/18/2019. (Copy of Memorandum and two blank service packets mailed to Leonard Haynes) (JCK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
