Bell v. Ray et al
Case Number: 3:2018cv00217
Filed: March 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Knoxville Office
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT ORDER, entered by the Clerk: this pro se prisoner's civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED with prejudice for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with Court orders pursuant to F ederal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 3] is DENIED. Plaintiff is ASSESSED total court fees in the amount of four hundred ($400.00) dollars, consisting of a filing fee of three hundred fifty dollars ($350.00), and an administrative fee of fifty dollars ($50.00). The Clerk is DIRECTED to forward a copy of this order to the Court's financial deputy. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal taken in this matter woul d not be taken in good faith. Thus, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the civil file at 3:18-cv-217. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on March 26, 2019. (copy mailed to Jason Bell, CLAIBORNE COUNTY JAIL, 415 STRAIGHT CREEK ROAD, NEW TAZEWELL, TN 37825) (AYB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bell v. Ray et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?