Kinney et al v. Anderson Lumber Company, Inc. et al
| William Kinney and Margaret Kinney |
| Anderson Lumber Company, Inc., Kizer & Black Attorneys, PLLC and McDonald, Levy & Taylor |
| 3:2018cv00227 |
| June 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Blount |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER: this pro se civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE based on plaintiffs' failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and the Court's declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs� 39; remaining state law claims. Furthermore, plaintiffs are hereby PRECLUDED, RESTRAINED, and ENJOINED from filing any new civil actions in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee without first obtaining written certif ication from this Court that the complaint has some legal and factual merit as set forth more fully herein. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case and is further PRECLUDED, RESTRAINED, AND ENJOINED from accepting any complaint filed by plaintiffs unless it includes this Court's certification as set forth herein. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on January 18, 2019. (mailed to William and Margaret Kinney, 2442 Allegheny Loop Rd, Maryville, TN 37803) (AYB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
