Johnson v. Lee
Petitioner: Charles D Johnson
Respondent: Randy Lee
Case Number: 3:2018cv00275
Filed: July 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Knoxville Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: H Bruce Guyton
Referring Judge: Harry S Mattice
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2018 Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (copy mailed to Charles Johnson at NECX) (JBR)
July 3, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles D Johnson. (JBR)
July 3, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Charles D Johnson.(JBR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Randy Lee
Represented By: Thomas Austin Watkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles D Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?