Scalf v. Claiborne County Jail
| Robert D Scalf |
| Claiborne County Jail and Claiborne County |
| 3:2018cv00333 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Claiborne |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Travis R McDonough |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00. Plaintiff is ORDERED to complete the service packet and return it to the Clerks Office within thirty (30) days of entry of this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 8/23/2018. (AML, ) Copy of M/O mailed to Plaintiff, along with service packet. Copy of M/O mailed to Sheriff of Claiborne County. Copy of M/O emailed to Court Financial Deputy. Docket updated per Order as to Defendant.
|
| Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (c/m to Robert D Scalf, CLAIBORNE COUNTY JAIL, 415 STRAIGHT CREEK ROAD, NEW TAZEWELL, TN 37825) (ABF) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Claiborne County Jail, filed by Robert D Scalf. (Attachments: #1 Other Envelope)(ABF) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert D Scalf. (Attachments: #1 Other Envelope)(ABF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
