The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. JDC Masonry, Inc. et al
The Cincinnati Insurance Company |
Jerry A. Drain, JDC Masonry, Inc. and Tammy M. Drain |
3:2018cv00462 |
October 26, 2018 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
H Bruce Guyton |
Harry S Mattice |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to all defendants. (RLK) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan Caralisa Connell on behalf of The Cincinnati Insurance Company (Connell, Jordan) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey S Price on behalf of The Cincinnati Insurance Company (Price, Jeffrey) |
District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr and Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton added. (RLK) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Corporate Interest by The Cincinnati Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Cincinnati Financial Corporation for The Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Lee, Melissa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Indemnity and Equitable Relief against Jerry A. Drain, Tammy M. Drain, JDC Masonry, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-3804304.), filed by The Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Indemnity Agreement, #2 Exhibit Performance Bond, #3 Exhibit Letter, #4 Exhibit Letter, #5 Exhibit Letter, #6 Exhibit Letter, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Lee, Melissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.