Smith-Langford v. Capstone Logistics LLC et al (JRG3)
Plaintiff: Tina M. Smith-Langford
Defendant: LMS Intellibound, LLC and Capstone Logistics LLC
Case Number: 3:2018cv00527
Filed: December 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: J Ronnie Greer
Referring Judge: H Bruce Guyton
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 704
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2019 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Tina M. Smith-Langford. LMS Intellibound, LLC waiver sent on 12/27/2018. (Young, Katherine)
January 13, 2019 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Tina M. Smith-Langford. Capstone Logistics LLC waiver sent on 12/27/2018. (Young, Katherine)
December 18, 2018 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Capstone Logistics LLC and LMS Intellibound, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons for LMS) (AYB)
December 18, 2018 Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet & Summons by Tina M. Smith-Langford. (Attachments: #1 Summons LMS, #2 Summons Capstone)(Young, Katherine)
December 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 12/17/2018. (AMP)
December 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 12/17/2018. (AMP)
December 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 12/17/2018. (AMP)
December 17, 2018 Filing 3 Administrative Notice to Counsel #2 Supplement : Summonses and Civil Cover Sheet do not contain any information. Please file completed Summonses and Civil Cover Sheet in non-fillable form using the event Supplement under Other Documents. Requirements due by 12/24/2018. (AMP)
December 17, 2018 District Judge J Ronnie Greer and Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton added. (AMP)
December 14, 2018 Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint, by Tina M. Smith-Langford. (Attachments: #1 Summons Capstone Logistics, LLC, #2 Summons LMS Intellibound, LLC)(Young, Katherine)
December 14, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-3840299.), filed by Tina M. Smith-Langford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Sec. of State Capstone, #2 Exhibit Sec. of State Intellibound, #3 Exhibit "Split with Dad" document, #4 Exhibit Consent of Party Plaintiff)(Young, Katherine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith-Langford v. Capstone Logistics LLC et al (JRG3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LMS Intellibound, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capstone Logistics LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina M. Smith-Langford
Represented By: Katherine A Young
Represented By: Link A Gibbons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?