Roberts-Banks v. Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc. (PLR1)
| Charlene Roberts-Banks |
| Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00010 |
| January 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Debra C Poplin |
| Pamela L Reeves |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 3/5/19. (Attachments: #1 Other Notice of Consent/Non-Consent) (ABF)
|
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint or in the Alternative to Stay Action and Compel Arbitration filed by Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc.. (Fonnesbeck, Shana) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint or in the Alternative to Stay Action and Compel Arbitration by Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Natalie Neely)(Fonnesbeck, Shana) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc.. (Fonnesbeck, Shana) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION (JOINT) OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc.. (Fonnesbeck, Shana) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Charlene Roberts-Banks. Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc. served on 1/21/2019. (Young, Katherine) |
|
Filing 5
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 1/7/19. (JBR)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 1/7/19. (JBR)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 1/7/19. (JBR)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc. (JBR) |
| District Judge Pamela L Reeves and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (JBR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-3853357.), filed by Charlene Roberts-Banks. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Right to Sue, #2 Exhibit Sec of State, #3 Exhibit Doctor Note June 2015, #4 Exhibit Doctor Note December 2015, #5 Summons, #6 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Young, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roberts-Banks v. Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc. (PLR1) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charlene Roberts-Banks | |
| Represented By: | Katherine A Young |
| Represented By: | Link A Gibbons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Shana G Fonnesbeck |
| Represented By: | J Christopher Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
