General Motors LLC v. Hart et al
General Motors LLC |
Betty Hart and Rovetta Phillips |
3:2019cv00153 |
April 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Curtis L Collier |
H Bruce Guyton |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Order Governing Sealing Confidential InformationSigned by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 4/30/2019. (DJH, ) |
Filing 5 Order Governing Motions To DismissSigned by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 4/30/2019. (DJH, ) |
Filing 4 Order Governing DepositionsSigned by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 4/30/2019. (DJH, ) |
Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint, (Civil Cover Sheet) by General Motors LLC. (Parker, Casey) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Corporate Interest by General Motors LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Motors Holdings, LLC for General Motors LLC. (Parker, Casey) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (In Interpleader) against Betty Hart, Rovetta Phillips ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-3959762.), filed by General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plan, #2 Exhibit B - Power of Attorney, #3 Exhibit C - 3-5-19 Letter)(Parker, Casey) |
No summons received with initiating documents. Therefore, summons not issued as to Betty Hart, Rovetta Phillips.. (DJH, ) |
District Judge Curtis L Collier and Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton added. (DJH, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.